Last week’s post may have unfairly left the reader hanging, in an unbearable tension over the reported surprise attack by the bogus institute, led by my former friend and gaming colleague, which may have seemed to the reader to have left me in a desperate and pitiable state. While I appreciate the sympathetic nature of this anxiety, as it is for my mental well being, I must sternly denounce the sentiment, if the reader did in fact actually experience it, as counterproductive and perhaps indicative of a lower estimation of my mental resilience and inner fortitude than I care to contemplate. As is often the case, pity can be taken too far, to the point that it becomes an insult. But if this insultingly heartfelt pity exists only in my mind then I can brush it off with ease, and let bygones be bygones. In any case, I did experience desperate hours before I turned for advice to an authority who can always be relied on for the best sort of counsel in trying times, Winston Churchill, and in addition to some delightful observations on the best procedures for defeating tyrants, I found his account of his famous napping procedure, which I immediately applied in my own life to secure the extra two or three hours of daily sleep needed to compose my counterattack, a lengthy condemnation and expose of the flounder and his machinations which I intend to insist be included as a disclaimer in any publication the Institute attempts to spatter against the ignominiously polluted wall of the modern publishing world. The statement is too lengthy to be included in a single blog post, so I will include only the first few paragraphs here so that the reader may gather a sense of the sweep and scope, and gain a perspective on the scale of its impact, by inevitable stylistic comparison alone, on the flounder’s diluted offering:
I wish to clarify several details with any unfortunate readers of this “collection” as they’re calling it. If these hypothetical (I fervently hope) readers have managed to swim through the chunky miasma of nonsense spewed out in the preemptive strike that the flounder (my former friend and employer) will probably call “the introduction” to this book, they will no doubt labor in confusion over who I am, why I am writing a statement for this book, why I am including a “draft” of a story conceived many years ago, and more importantly, why this book was ever printed and why they have wasted a few moments of their limited allotment of time as a sentient being in this universe attempting to read it. I will answer all these questions. And if the reader is one of those sad, deluded souls who spent money on this book, I can only offer them my condolences.
Years ago I participated in a weekly gaming group that included several friends and acquaintances, among them the flounder. We did not use computers to play this game, but would actually meet in person, usually at the home of that week’s Dungeon Master, and usually used published dungeons and maps. But sometimes we would create our own materials, and the flounder, being one of those troubling personalities with plenty of creative tendencies but no self critical instincts at all, produced a comic dungeon that we all enjoyed very much, as a brief break, a change of pace. I must emphasize that most of us primarily enjoyed the comedy in direct proportion to its singularity and uniqueness. After he began to eagerly produce his comical dungeons like an assembly line, our enjoyment dropped precipitously. Soon, he was producing more dungeons than the rest of the group combined. I am not speaking of a large group; the game nights varied in size from week to week, but there were about three or four people in the core group, which swelled to eight or nine, some of them truly odious people. Although we tried to trade off hosting duties equally, with the host traditionally serving as DM, this system broke down under the absurdist wave of comic dungeons. The crisis prompted a secret meeting of the core group, the true aficionados, who convened at the Arby’s on 35th to discuss the darkness engulfing our way of life. Who were the members of this group? Our names don’t matter. We were the true gaming aficionados, the purists. Who initiated this secret meeting? The ringleader? I don’t actually recall. We were desperate men, beset with enemies, several of whom patronized this very Arby’s. We conducted the meeting in a furtive corner, away from the windows and hidden from the line of sight from the condiment palette (it took a slow walk around the dining area to find a good spot).
And from this semi private table, over curly fries and jalapeño bites, we hatched a diversionary tactic worthy to stand alongside Churchill’s D-Day wooden army. Briefly to be told, we changed the core gaming night to Sunday. Then we designed a phaseout program for the Saturday night gaming group, to mimic a slow waning of attendance that would not elicit curiosity from the “pseudo-gamers” as one of the members of our group, not myself, called the people we wanted to slough off. We wanted a non-confrontational end to the comic dungeons, and to continue to enjoy weekly gaming nights. So we took turns attending the Saturday games for a short while, one of us attending each week, which immediately halved the operating size of those meetings. I had, rather casually I’m afraid, predicted that the crowd mentality of the “dungeon tourists” as we called them, sensing the checkout line so to speak, would end the Saturday night games in three months. The others expressed their vehement doubts of this overly optimistic prediction, but even I was staggered at the efficacy of my method, at the swiftness of the reaction, and the incredible accuracy of my prediction, as attested by the other “purists” (as we called ourselves) on the occasion of our next secret meeting, at the same Arby’s, almost 3 months to the day later, wherein we all agreed to move the game nights back to a reclaimed Saturday night, as the tourists had all ceased attendance at the Saturday games! Now, as I have indicated, the Saturday night meetings were a broken system, a system in decline, and not only, I am forced by my incredibly rigid personal sense of fairness to admit, from the comic dungeons, so I can’t quite credit our strategy alone for the swift success, but I well remember that Unanimous vote of the secret purist cabal as one of the most singularly triumphant and transcendently joyful moments of my life. I felt as I imagine Moses would have felt, had he been allowed to watch the children of Israel stream back into the promised land under his leadership.
But like that great man, I was denied the fruits of my mighty labors, after only four sweet weeks of gaming as it ought to be.
Just as I had settled blissfully, gratefully, into a routine of reading, intense thought, bursts of writing, and the stimulating release of the weekly game nights, I received an inexcusably early in the morning telephone call from the flounder. He indicated that he had learned to web program and had created a web site dedicated to his art, which he invited me to see and offer opinions on. I refused to do so, as I had absolutely no interest in the internet at the time, and I hoped he would go away, but a scant few weeks later he appeared at the Wasatch Hollow library during my mother’s Wednesday night DHS meeting, which I usually accompanied her to out of concern for her safety, as she liked to walk the block and a half to the library in the summer for some daft reason, and the neighborhood is no longer the monotonously safe place it was in my youth. The flounder popped up like an awkwardly malevolent genie at my side while I perused the titles in the sadly depleted science fiction section, thrusting his face close to mine and startling me so severely that I stumbled against the soft immensity of Randall Lund, a schoolmate of mine two years my senior whose parents are in my parents Ward but whom I have never spoken with even though he seemed to have found permanent living accommodations on the disgusting benches by the science fiction rack at that branch. I experienced a level of physical closeness with Randall that I thought I would not ever experience with any human being, and hope for the remainder of my life to avoid that level of closeness with any living thing on earth with the exception of Princess Patty, my cousins aged corgi, a beloved fixture of my youth who enjoys tummy rubs and scratches behind the ears.
After cursing the flounders name, I asked how he came to be there and he insisted that he had popped into the library by chance to check out an art book even though I knew that he dislikes the Wasatch Hollow branch intensely for its smell and that the only art books he has ever been interested in are the modern photography books that the Mormon staff at that branch routinely eviserate with scissors the moment they appear in the donation bin.
After I had voiced this sentiment, in tones appropriately modulated for the library environment, the flounder suddenly changed tack, adopting a sadly unconvincing managerial tone, indicated that he had been thinking of me for a position with his new venture, an educational institute that would teach humanities curricula to whatever miserable dregs of suburban society that could not muster the intellectual wherewithal to gain entry to a real university. Despite a sincere attempt on my part, made out of respect for our friendship, to piece together coherent meaning from his inchoate mutterings, I could not ascertain any logical structure to his business plan for this enterprise, beyond the questionable assumption that this sham institute would attract tuition paying students by calibrating their tuition based on the graduates actual expected earnings. I indicated to him, as gently as possible, that since this “Institute” would be teaching art and literature, an honestly calculated fee based on such a ratio would result in a disappointingly meager operating budget, and that he would be forced to staff the faculty of this institute on a volunteer basis. He expressed relief that I had voiced this estimate, and offered me the position of Dean of Literature at once, thanking me for bringing the salary negotiations to such an agreeably swift end. Disarmed by his frankness (if you’ll excuse the wording), I found myself accepting the position without any hesitation.
The next month would have been a whirlwind if the institute had ever actually gotten past a few pathetic HTML files on the flounder’s home pc, but the river of work, promised by the flounder to imminently flood my waking hours with institute business, never materialized, and if you have spent even a tenth of your waking hours reading as much as I have, and experienced that fraction of the consistently developed metaphors that I have, you’ll know, without my even bothering to explicitly write it, that the word “trickle” will be trotted out to humorously contrast a certain something with what a certain someone most certainly did not ever put much further work into.
Stay tuned for part 2 of the Grand Remonstrance, next week